
In industrial formulations, metallic pigment powder is used to create a metallic visual effect through controlled reflection and light scattering. In practice, suppliers may offer different pigment “families” that look metallic but behave very differently in processing and durability.
Most purchasing issues happen when “metallic” is treated as a single requirement. A more reliable approach is to define (1) the target appearance (satin metallic vs. glitter sparkle), (2) the performance environment (UV, heat, chemicals), and (3) the processing constraints (high shear, filtration, extrusion). If you are evaluating iron-oxide-coated pearlescent pigments for controlled metallic luster, you can reference this Metalic Lustre Pearlescent Pigment series as a representative industrial option.
From a manufacturer’s perspective, the key is not only visual impact, but repeatability: the same shade, sparkle, and flop across batches, production lines, and customer plants.
Particle size is one of the strongest predictors of both appearance and processing. As a practical rule: smaller platelets tend to create a smoother, more uniform metallic sheen, while larger particles increase sparkle but can raise risks of sedimentation, screen clogging, and surface roughness.
Different metallic pigment powders achieve their look via different structures (e.g., metal flakes vs. metal-oxide-coated pearlescent platelets). For iron-oxide-coated pearlescent pigments, hue can be tuned by coating thickness, and a range of bronze, brown, red, fuchsia, and red-green tones can be achieved while maintaining a metallic luster.
Ask for application-relevant color data rather than only visual photos. In coatings and molded parts, the perceived metallic quality is typically a combination of background color, pigment loading, film thickness, and orientation. For color-critical programs, specify a measurable target such as ΔE ≤ 1.0 (or your internal standard) against an agreed master standard under a defined illuminant and geometry.
“Metallic” is not one finish. The table below shows how manufacturers often map product families to particle size ranges to create different visual textures. The goal is to align particle size with your surface smoothness, film thickness, and filtration constraints.
| Series feel | Code | Product name | Particle size | Typical use case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Satin | CR 5520 | Coloray Satin Bronze | 5–25 μm | Uniform metallic sheen for smoother films |
| Satin | CR 5522 | Coloray Satin Red Brown | 5–25 μm | Metallic color depth with controlled texture |
| Satin | CR 5524 | Coloray Satin Wine Red | 5–25 μm | Decorative metallic tones in thin films |
| Classic metallic | CR 5500 | Coloray Bronze | 10–60 μm | General-purpose metallic look with moderate sparkle |
| Classic metallic | CR 5506 | Coloray Green Brown | 10–60 μm | Metallic effects in coatings, plastics, and decorative items |
| Glitter | CR 5530 | Coloray Glitter Bronze | 10–95 μm | Higher sparkle where coarse particles are acceptable |
| Glitter | CR 5534 | Coloray Glitter Wine Red | 10–95 μm | Decorative sparkle accents in thicker films |
| Sparkle | CR 5550 | Coloray Sparkle Bronze | 10–125 μm | Maximum sparkle; confirm filtration/nozzle/screen limits |
If you are building a portfolio across multiple finishes, it is often more efficient to select a consistent pigment chemistry (for durability and compatibility) and vary particle size to tune the visual effect. For broader options beyond a single series, review your supplier’s industrial offering such as this industrial grade pearlescent pigment category.
Even a high-quality metallic pigment powder can look poor if dispersion and orientation are not controlled. The following practices reduce common production defects (specks, streaks, weak sparkle, shade drift).
Below is a practical checklist used in industrial development work to choose the right metallic pigment powder for a specific system. The intent is to reduce trial-and-error and align product selection with manufacturing realities.
If your project requires a coordinated set of industrial effects (silver/white, interference, gold, and metallic lustre), suppliers often group these under a single family such as a Classic Series industrial pearlescent pigment range, making it easier to standardize quality expectations and documentation.
When selecting a metallic pigment powder supplier, the fastest way to reduce risk is to standardize what you request in a technical package. Below is a practical checklist used in procurement and quality assurance.
A supplier that can answer these items quickly and consistently is typically set up to support long-term programs rather than sample-only trials.
For many industrial customers, iron-oxide-coated pearlescent pigments are selected when the priority is a metallic appearance combined with predictable handling and stability. In metallic lustre series pigments, coating thickness can create multiple hues (bronze, brown, red, fuchsia, red-green) while maintaining a strong metallic luster and improved tinting behavior.
If your project requires a defined palette across multiple particle sizes—such as 5–25 μm satin finishes for uniformity, plus 10–95 μm to 10–125 μm sparkle grades for highlight effects—an iron-oxide pearlescent approach can simplify qualification because the “look” is adjusted mainly by size selection rather than completely changing pigment chemistry.
For buyers who want to move from concept to production efficiently, we recommend qualifying metallic pigment powder with a short, repeatable test plan (target shade panel, process simulation, and durability screen) and then locking in the specification. If you need published codes and size ranges as a starting point, the Metalic Lustre Pearlescent Pigment listing provides an example series structure that can be mapped directly to finish requirements.